REtrofitting of the building stock in seismic areas with Energy efficient, Sustainable and AFfordablE solutions
ERIES-RE-Safe
Dataset Description
The aim of the RE-Safe project is the seismic characterization of innovative wood-based-skin technology for the integrated retrofitting interventions of existing buildings. The system is based on the idea of cladding the building with an external structural skin realized using Cross Laminated Timber panels (e-CLT) fastened to the existing structure with friction dampers. The RE-Safe project proposed a dynamic investigation of the e-CLT technology by means of shaking table tests on a 3D specimen (strengthened RC frame with strong similarities with previous specimens dynamically tested within the ERIES research infrastructures). Different arrangements (regular and irregular) of the e-CLT system were dynamically investigated.
This dataset contains the experimental results of the shake table tests carried out at LNEC on a reduced scale (2/3) specimen. Six specimen configurations were tested, starting with the bare frame (configuration 0) and following with five different combinations of CLT panels distribution and tightening torque on the friction dampers. In configuration 1 the CLT panels were placed asymmetrically and the bolts on the friction dampers were tightened to a torque of 58Nm. In configuration 2 the CLT panels were placed symmetrically, and the 1st floor base plates were tightened to the RC frame. In configuration 3 the bolts on the top friction dampers were tightened to a torque of 58Nm*(1/2), and the bolts on the bottom friction dampers were tightened to a torque of 58Nm*(2/3). In configuration 4 the bolts on the friction dampers were all untightened. In configuration 5 only two out of the three bolts on each friction damper were tightened with 3kg * 0,6m = 18Nm torque.
The specimen was instrumented with accelerometers on the floors and CLT panels, displacement transducers in the friction dampers, and optical transducers for global floor displacements. The 2009 L'Aquila earthquake (L'AQUILA-IT.AVZ.00.HNN.D.IT-2009 record) was selected as target for the shake table tests.
The original acceleration time series was cropped and scaled according to the Cauchy-Froude similitude law and was imposed only in specimen X direction. The testing protocol consisted of imposing this seismic motion with increasing nominal target intensity and performing dynamic identification tests in between. When the specimen configuration changed, the instrumentation was adjusted accordingly, and the shake table tests were repeated.
Specimens
1. RC Frame Retrofitted with External CLT Skin and Friction Dampers
2
The prototype building is designed in compliance with the D.M. 1974, which represents the reference standard for RC structural design during 1970s in Italy. As for the materials, C16/20 concrete and steel reinforcement of grade Feb38K are used, according to the common practice of that time. The prototype consists of a two-storey RC structure with an interstorey height of 3.00 m and two spans in both X- and Y-directions, resulting in nine columns per storey. The X-direction spans measure 3.00 m and 4.50 m, while both Y-direction spans are 3.38 m. The uni-directional floor slab is oriented along the Y-axis, with a total height of 23 cm, consisting of a 5-cm topping and 18-cm joists with a base width of 15 cm, spaced at two joists per 1.5 m. The slab infills are made of polystyrene blocks (60×100 cm). Columns, bearing beams and ring beams have cross sections of 25×25 cm2, 25×40 cm2 and 25×30 cm2, respectively. Steel bars arrangements are defined according to minimum code provisions, using 8 mm diameter stirrups and 12 and 18 mm longitudinal bars. Bent-up longitudinal bars are adopted to contribute simultaneously to bending and shear resistance.
Considering the shaking table dimensions and maximum load capacity, the prototype building described in section 2.1 is scaled down using the Cauchy-Froude similitude law with a scale factor λ=2/3. Consequently, the mock-up geometry and reinforcement are obtained by scaling the prototype building. The resulting plan dimensions are 5.0 m (X) and 4.50 m (Y), with a 2.0 m interstorey height. Columns have 17×17 cm cross sections with four longitudinal 8 mm diameter longitudinal rebars and 6 mm diameter stirrups, while beams measure 17×27 cm and 17×20 cm, with longitudinal 12 and 8 mm diameter reinforcement. The floor system consists of a 3 cm slab supported by 10 cm joists.
To satisfy dynamic similitude, additional masses are applied to the structure to account for the increased specific mass of the materials of approximately 50%, and to represent the gravity loads of non-structural components. Hence, additional masses are placed at each storey. The asymmetric location of the masses shifts the centre of mass of the structure towards the north side with respect to the geometric centre in plan, resulting in a flexible north side and a stiff south side. The eccentricity between the centre of mass and the geometric centre is 4.60%.
According to laboratory protocols, the mock-up was cast in a separated area and subsequent lifted and placed on the shaking table. Consequently, the foundations were specifically designed to withstand the maximum design action without concrete cracking during lifting and resulted with a cross-section of 55×17 cm2.
Compressive tests were performed on concrete cubes cast during construction to characterise material properties. Tensile coupon tests on longitudinal rebars were also performed.
1. Shake-table test of bare RC frame
The experimental campaign followed a progressive sequence of seismic inputs. The bare RC frame is first subjected to a low-intensity excitation (PGA = 0.04 g) to characterise its elastic response while avoiding damage, prior to retrofit installation.
Instrumentation
A comprehensive instrumentation layout is defined to monitor the structural response during the shaking table tests. The global response is captured using 14 accelerometers: six installed on the foundation and four at each storey. Floor displacements are measured through wire potentiometers and optical transducers placed at two opposite corners of each level, allowing the evaluation of interstorey drifts in both X- and Y-directions as well as floor rotations. Three LVDTs are mounted on the foundation beam to detect possible micro-sliding relative to the shaking table.
2. Shake-table test of RC frame strengthened by e-CLT system
The specimen is retrofitted using CLT panels made of C24 timber, with a total thickness of 80 mm, composed of three layers (30–20–30 mm). The friction dampers are calibrated to be activated at a sliding force of 10 kN. Two retrofit configurations are defined based on the seismic response of the unstrengthened structure. In the first configuration, CLT panels along the X-direction are installed in the long bays at the first storey and in the short bays at the second storey. This layout is intended to enhance the stiffness of the weakest storey (i.e. first storey), thereby increasing the energy dissipation capacity where damage concentration is expected. The second configuration reflects a more realistic retrofit scenario, consistent with typical architectural layouts of existing buildings, allowing vertical alignment of the strengthening system along the building height. In this case, the largest and stiffest panels are installed at both storeys on the north side, while smaller panels are placed on the south
side. In the Y-direction, the CLT panels are located in the same spans for both configurations. The second configuration was tested as configuration 2 to 5, with different tightening schemes.
Instrumentation
Besides the instrumentation used in the bare frame configuration, the e-CLT system is specifically monitored by installing LVDTs on the friction dampers to measure the relative displacement between the free and anchor profiles.
Project Metadata
Rights
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
CC BY 4.0
0 sessions
0 downloads
0 views
0 metadata
0 file previews
Feedback
We are always looking to improve the quality of our data and metadata. If you have any feedback or suggestions, please let us know.
Send Feedback