projectPhoto
2024 - 2024
S
Seismic Eng.

Maria Giuseppina Limongelli

George Mylonakis

Anastasios Sextos

Mauro Aimar

Sotirios Argyroudis

Mohamed Belmokhtar

+26 more

GEM Taxonomy string

projectPhoto
2024 - 2024
S
Seismic Eng.

GEM Taxonomy string

FOSDL

Structural Performance Monitoring and Evaluation of Scoured Bridges under Dynamic Actions

ERIES: Scour & Shake

SOIL - STRUCTURE INTERACTION

Dataset Description

This dataset presents results from a comprehensive experimental campaign investigating the dynamic response of bridge piers on embedded caisson foundations under scour conditions. The project was conducted at the UKCRIC Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction (SoFSI) Laboratory at the University of Bristol, as part of the project Scour & Shake: Structural Performance Monitoring and Evaluation of Scoured Bridges under Dynamic Actions, within the project framework ERIES: Engineering Research Infrastructure for European Synergies (2022–2026), funded by Horizon Europe (Ref: 101058684-HORIZON-INFRA-2021-SERV-01-07).

The experimental programme focused on: (a) the effectiveness of vibration-based methods for scour identification, (b) the accuracy of available numerical modelling techniques, and (c) the effects of scour remedial measures in improving seismic performance. The tests were performed using a 4.8×1.0×1.2m³ equivalent shear beam box on a 6×4m², 50-tonne biaxial shaking table. The soil container was filled with 950mm of densely pluviated silica sand, underlain by a 40mm rubber layer to simulate deep soil conditions. Two model piers were tested:

- A slender (flexible) model, representing a tall pier with a long-span bridge;

- A stiff (squat) model, simulating a shorter pier with a lighter deck.

The piers were constructed using rectangular steel sections, with steel top masses connected by angle brackets. The caisson foundations were built from cylindrical steel sections, filled with concrete to achieve the target mass, and externally coated with glued sand to realistically reproduce interface friction.

Each pier was initially subjected to fixed-base tests, for modal identification. Then, the piers were placed in the soil container and the following scour scenarios were investigated:

- No scour (caisson fully embedded)

- Low scour (caisson exposed up to 1/3 of its depth)

- High scour (caisson exposed up to 2/3 of its depth)

- Remedial measures, involving gravel infill in the scour hole (slender specimen only)

Each setup was subjected to white noise tests with increasing amplitudes from 0.01 to 0.50g for modal identification, as well as a series of seismic ground motions corresponding to low and high seismicity. In total, over 250 tests were conducted. Fixed-base tests were performed on 27th June 2024, and full soil-structure interaction tests during the week commencing 15th July 2024.

Earthquake Engineering
Geotechnics
Experimental Study
Structural Engineering
Numerical Analysis
Environmental Engineering

Specimens

1. Slender (flexible) model

5

Representing a tall pier with a long-span bridge

projectPhoto

1. Fixed base

No Soil-Structure Interaction

projectPhoto

Instrumentation

System response was measured via Accelerometers (Acc) and Strain Gauges (SG), as shown in the Figure.

2. No scour

Caisson fully embedded

projectPhoto

Instrumentation

System response was measured via Accelerometers (Acc), Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDTs), and Strain Gauges (SG), as shown in the Figure.

3. Low scour

Caisson exposed up to 1/3 of its depth

projectPhoto

Instrumentation

System response was measured via Accelerometers (Acc), Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDTs), and Strain Gauges (SG), as shown in the Figure.

4. High scour

Caisson exposed up to 2/3 of its depth

projectPhoto

Instrumentation

System response was measured via Accelerometers (Acc), Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDTs), and Strain Gauges (SG), as shown in the Figure.

5. Remedial measures,

Involving gravel infill in the scour hole (slender specimen only)

projectPhoto

Instrumentation

System response was measured via Accelerometers (Acc), Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDTs), and Strain Gauges (SG), as shown in the Figure.

2. Stiff (squat) model

4

Simulating a shorter pier with a lighter deck.

projectPhoto

1. Fixed base

No Soil-Structure Interaction

projectPhoto

Instrumentation

System response was measured via Accelerometers (Acc) and Strain Gauges (SG), as shown in the Figure.

2. No scour

Caisson fully embedded

projectPhoto

Instrumentation

System response was measured via Accelerometers (Acc), Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDTs), and Strain Gauges (SG), as shown in the Figure.

3. Low scour

Caisson exposed up to 1/3 of its depth

projectPhoto

Instrumentation

System response was measured via Accelerometers (Acc), Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDTs), and Strain Gauges (SG), as shown in the Figure.

4. High scour

Caisson exposed up to 2/3 of its depth

projectPhoto

Instrumentation

System response was measured via Accelerometers (Acc), Linear Variable Displacement Transducers (LVDTs), and Strain Gauges (SG), as shown in the Figure.

Dataset in Public Repository

DOI

10.5281/zenodo.15229605

Publication Date

17 Jul 2026, 08:52

Project Metadata

Rights

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0

3 sessions

0 downloads

3 views

0 metadata

8 file previews

view metrics

Feedback

We are always looking to improve the quality of our data and metadata. If you have any feedback or suggestions, please let us know.

Send Feedback