RecycleSlab - Structural Behaviour of Recycled Aggregate Reinforced Concrete Flat Slabs with Drop Panels under Seismic and Cyclic Actions
RecycleSlab
Dataset Description
This dataset was collected within the ERIES-RecycleSlab research project, which investigated the seismic performance of a full-scale, two-storey flat-slab building with drop panels constructed using concrete incorporating coarse recycled concrete aggregates (CRCAC). The structure was subjected to combined gravity and lateral actions through a sequence of pseudo-dynamic seismic tests considering two intensity levels, corresponding to the Serviceability Limit State (SLS) and the Ultimate Limit State (ULS). Subsequently, cyclic horizontal loading was applied under constant gravity loads, with progressively increasing displacement amplitudes until near-failure conditions were reached. A brief description of the experimental setup describing the structural design, testing protocol, specimen geometry, and material characterization is presented.
The testing of the full-scale two-storey flat slab structure was carried out at the European Laboratory for Structural Assessment (ELSA) of the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre.
Specimens
1. As-built structure
2
The test specimen was a two story test structure featuring concrete with coarse recycled concrete aggregates (CRCAC) flat slabs, arranged in a three by two bay layout. Longitudinal spans measured 4.5 m and 5.0 m, while all transverse spans were 4.5 m. Each story had a height of 3.2 m. The drop panels had a thickness of 0.25 m, with the rest of slab being 0.15 m thick. The square column sections vary by location, with a side dimension equal to: 0.40 m for interior columns, 0.35 m for edge columns and 0.30 m for corner columns. Steel load cells were embedded at the columns mid height during construction to record internal force demands, following experimental practices previously used at the JRC ELSA laboratory. The building was designed for a dead load corresponding to the self-weight of the structural elements plus an allowance for the self-weight of non-structural elements of 3 kN/m2. The live load was taken as 2 kN/m2 assuming ψ2 = 0.30 (for assessment of the quasi-permanent loading). The design earthquake action consisted of a 0.6% horizontal drift ratio. The longitudinal reinforcement detailing in both slabs was the same, although the first-floor slab contained shear studs as punching shear reinforcement.
The reinforcement used was B500, ductility class C. At the columns, the splicing was done using rebar couplers from Peikko. C30/37 concrete was engineered and produced by the industrial user partner Holcim (Italia) SpA. The recycled aggregates were incorporated as 50% of the coarse aggregates (> 4 mm), which results in a 29% substitution ratio of all (fine + coarse) aggregates. The cement was a CEM II/B-LL 42.5R from Holcim (ECOCEM) and the plasticizer was Mapei Dynamon.
1. Seismic testing
The research team performed two pseudo-dynamic (PsD) tests on the specimen in the as-built configuration using input accelerograms which spectra comply with EC8. The input ground motion for the seismic tests was the Y component of signal 00712ya recorded during the MW 6.4 Bingӧl earthquake (Turkey) of 1 May 2003. The original PGA = 2.92 m/s2 was scaled at 31% and 87% for tests SLS (Serviceability Limit State) and ULS (Ultimate Limit State) respectively, to match the corresponding Eurocode 8 (EC8 2004) elastic spectra. The tests were performed considering only two longitudinal (east-west) translation degrees of freedom (DoF), one for each slab. The PsD tests were implemented adopting the hybrid substructuring method in order to simulate the joint effect of the physical model and a virtual reinforced concrete wall. This implied considering additional stiffness and damping matrices.
emf
emf
Instrumentation
The instrumentation measured the force and displacement imposed by each actuator. Additionally, inclinometers and displacement transducers were installed to monitor the response of the slab in the vicinity of several columns. Some columns were also monitored monitoring their rotation at the bottom and top ends. Furthermore, ad-hoc developed load-cells were installed at columns mid-height to measure the internal action, namely the axial load, the shear in the direction of loading and the corresponding bending moment.
2. Cyclic testing
After the completion of the PsD tests, the experimental campaign continued performing cyclic tests. These tests were performed applying series of three cycles at increasing amplitudes. The control strategy of the test was mixed, imposing a target displacement at the second slab, while force control was adopted at the first slab with a target equal to half of the force applied to the top slab. All cyclic tests were performed at a displacement rate equal to 0.8 mm/s, the maximum achieved top drift was 3% (i.e. 189 mm) on the as-built configuration.
Instrumentation
The instrumentation was identical to that used for the experiment 1.
2. Retrofitted structure
1
Starting from the As-built configuration, the specimen was retrofitted after the completion of the cyclic tests. For the second-floor slab, that initially did not contain punching shear reinforcement, provisions were made for retrofitting half of the connections using post-installed shear reinforcement. Such installation took place after the first phase of the experimental campaign and it is traced by the specimen configuration switching from As-built to Retrofitted.
1. Cyclic testing
After the installation of the retrofit, the experimental campaign continued performing cyclic tests on the retrofitted specimen. These tests were performed adopting the same testing strategy of experiment 2 performed on the As-built specimen. The maximum achieved top drift was 6% (i.e. 378 mm) on the retrofitted configuration.
Instrumentation
The instrumentation was identical to that used for the experiment 1 performed on specimen 1 (As-built configuration).
Project Metadata
Rights
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
CC BY 4.0
1 sessions
0 downloads
1 views
0 metadata
1 file previews
Feedback
We are always looking to improve the quality of our data and metadata. If you have any feedback or suggestions, please let us know.
Send Feedback